Didjuknow that Mattel once tried to release the Oreo Barbie?
Now question to you- is the first thing that popped into your head the cookie or the derogatory term directed at a Black person for "acting" white?
from wikipedia
In 1997 Mattel joined forces with Nabisco to launch a cross-promotion of Barbie with Oreo cookies. Oreo Fun Barbie was marketed as someone with whom little girls could play after class and share "America's favorite cookie." As had become the custom, Mattel manufactured both a white and a black version. Critics argued that in the African American community Oreo is a derogatory term meaning that the person is "black on the outside and white on the inside," like the chocolate sandwich cookie itself. The doll was unsuccessful and Mattel recalled the unsold stock, making it sought after by collectors.[19]
Are Black people too deep sometimes? Seriously it's a question I'm putting out there...
Have your Urban Chameleon story featured by e-mailing tickles.tv@gmail.com
click here for: How the Urban Chameleon Came to be
Are Black people too deep sometimes? Seriously it's a question I'm putting out there...
Have your Urban Chameleon story featured by e-mailing tickles.tv@gmail.com
click here for: How the Urban Chameleon Came to be
Whats so funny about this is that the white Barbie has the word "Cracker" all up in front of the box. I mean it reads like "Cracker Barbie." I doubt that has even crossed anyone's mind.
ReplyDeleteYes, we are. We need to lighten up sometime. Everything is not racism. I notice that the white doll has. White folks are not complaining about the RITZ "CRACKER BARBIE". I find this extremely funny.
ReplyDeleteyou DO realize that the Ritz Cracker Barbie is NOT a REAL Barbie, right? It was a joke... someone photoshopped this picture...
ReplyDeleteTHAT IS PLAIN RACIST RIGHT THERE NO WONDER IT'S UNSUCESSFUL AND I FIND THAT VERY RACIST SO THEIR SAYING AFRICAN AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE FAKE?
ReplyDeleteYes, Marisa, it was real. Read the Wiki on it.
ReplyDelete